Wednesday 21 February 2018

Are we looking at the metrics that measure Quality education all wrong?

Education system is highly complex. Small data can fix gaps. But is that enough? 


Last year I got a fantastic opportunity to visit the United Nations Headquarters in NYC.  As I visited the different chambers where many resolutions have been passed over the years, the budding policy wonk in me was hungry to learn more. UNICEF’s “School-in-a-box” kit which is used as a back-to-school operation around the world got me thinking about the education system and about the different variables used to quantify quality education in developing countries.

Big Data in educational reform and its impact

In an article in The Washington Post, “’Big Data’ was supposed to fix education. It didn’t. It’s time for ‘small data’”, the author talks about how Big Data has only helped reveal correlations between the various factors and not causality. Thus systemic improvements in the education system by using this information is not as useful as we may want it to be. Since education system is complex by nature, small data that captures the essence of learning and teaching in the classroom is what would eventually assist in making more effective policies.

Sustainable development goals (SDG) and Quality education

The 2030 Agenda created by UN has 17 goals. The 4th goal being Quality Education has set most developing countries on the right path to incrementally achieve this goal. Various programs undertaken by Global Partnership for Education has resulted in an increase of youth literacy from 71% in 2000-05 to 75% in 2008-13. World Bank’s SABER ( Systems Approach to Better Education Results) program helps identify where individual countries need most interventions by collecting data on educational institutions and policies. Knowledge integration of data collected by these programs will be challenging, but will prove to be powerful in gauging the extent of improvement of these systems over the years. It would also help in identifying the crucial indicators for building a robust educational system.
SDG Target: “Equitable and quality primary and secondary education leading to effective learning outcomes”
In order to reach one of the targets set by the UN, it is vital to have quality data in order to make effective decisions to enforce the best practices thus improving the system. But how does one decide the metrics for this data? Various studies carried out by US Department of Education suggest that Teacher Assignment, Teacher Experience, Teacher Academic Skills, Class size, Technology, Academic Development, Goals, School Leadership among many others are used as quality measures. Another paper published by National Center for Education Statistics explains about using measures like Graduation rates, Proportion of students graduated without delay, drop-out rates, % of unemployed and so on. While using all these parameters may be one way to measure the quality, are we missing out on data points that may be unique to communities? Is there a danger of way too much generalization through the above mentioned metrics that cloud our abilities to understand the true underlying ground realities? We all do agree that we cannot compare the education systems of developing countries with those of the developed countries. Then is there more we can do in terms of quality data collection and additional metrics we can use specifically for developing countries?

Pulse of Education system in Developing countries

Learning Unleashed” an Economist article mentions that the number of private schools have increased substantially over the years in developing nations. A large section of the society has preferred private schools over public schools due to poor infrastructure, quality of education in public schools. Lack of competition have left these public schools high and dry with no incentive for improvement. So it may be meaningful to identify metrics that measure competition in our data collection that contributes in an indirect yet significant way to quality education.
Along with variables that intend to capture the qualitative information about the internal school environment, we must also pay attention to the external environment. One can measure competition by geo-spatially mapping different schools in the surroundings, identifying if they’re private or public, funding for the schools and cost incurred per student.
Studies have shown that there is a strong correlation between quality education and diversity in schools. In most developing countries, public schools are mostly attended by children that belong to low-income groups and private schools by the higher income groups. Although, most schools now try to include children from all strata of the society, the students do not feel socially included leading to below average performance. Thus “socially-inclusive” variable is an important one in better understanding the quality of education.
Data about the surrounding physical condition of the school is a crucial factor too. Cleanliness and safety must be captured with the rest of the data points.

Changing reforms with changing times

While quality data collection has an undeniable role in making a positive impact in this field, suitable policies and reforms must be enforced making use of the inferences obtained from the collected data. Since private schools are preferred, it may be a good move to incentivize the private sector to invest in public schools. Developing countries like India have created a barrier to market entry by making land ownership a pre-requisite for building a school. Thus entrepreneurs with low capital with a drive to build schools lose opportunities.
It may also be a good move to allocate precise and limited number of responsibilities to primary school teachers with specific targets. For example, by ensuring a primary school teacher concentrates on improving only the reading skills of the students, it will be easy to keep track of the progress.

There’s a long way to go before the education system gets fixed for good. Good quality data, data analysis married to timely policy reforms can accelerate this process. Data alone is no silver bullet!

References:




No comments:

Post a Comment